↓ Skip to main content

Identifying Barriers and Pathways to Success for New Occupational Therapy Faculty Members: A Pilot Survey

Overview of attention for article published in Occupational Therapy in Health Care, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Identifying Barriers and Pathways to Success for New Occupational Therapy Faculty Members: A Pilot Survey
Published in
Occupational Therapy in Health Care, August 2017
DOI 10.1080/07380577.2017.1354269
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Research suggests new health care professional faculty members benefit from assistance and support in the transition from the clinic to academia; however, few recent studies have been conducted to determine if this is true for occupational therapy. This descriptive pilot study explores the barriers that may face new occupational therapy faculty members and suggests strategies to assist new faculty members in their transition to academia. Through an electronic survey, identified barriers, challenges, and potential resolutions for the transitioning of new faculty members are highlighted. The results suggest the need for enhanced preparations for a career in academia; as well as new faculty member orientations that include instruction on professional development, classroom management, academic culture, scholarship, and mentoring.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 14%
Student > Master 3 8%
Librarian 2 6%
Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 16 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 7 19%
Engineering 3 8%
Computer Science 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 19 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2017.
All research outputs
#22,322,468
of 34,372,222 outputs
Outputs from Occupational Therapy in Health Care
#109
of 301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,819
of 356,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Occupational Therapy in Health Care
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 301 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.