↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A skeleton-tree-based approach to acinar morphometric analysis using microcomputed tomography with comparison of acini in young and old C57BL/6 mice
Published in
Journal of Applied Physiology, March 2016
DOI 10.1152/japplphysiol.00923.2015
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We seek to establish a method, using interior tomographic techniques (Xradia MicroXCT-400), for acinar morphometric analysis using the pathway center lines from µCT images as the road-map. Through the application of these techniques, we present a method to extend the atlas of murine lungs to acinar levels, and present a comparison between two age groups of the C57BL/6 strain. Lungs fixed via vascular perfusion were scanned using high-resolution µCT protocols. Individual acini were segmented, and skeletonized paths to alveolar sacs from the entrance to the acinus were formed. Morphometric parameters including branch lengths, diameters, and branching angles were generated. Six mice each, at two age groups (~20, ~90 weeks of age), were studied. Additive Gaussian noise (0 mean and SD 1, 2, 5 and 10) was used to test the robustness of the analytical method. Noise-based variations were within ±6µm for branch lengths and ±5µm for diameters. At a noise level of 10, errors increased. Branch diameters were less susceptible to noise than lengths. There was >95% centerline overlap across all noise levels. The measurements obtained using the centerlines as a road map were not affected by added noise. Acini from younger mice had smaller branch diameters and lengths at all generations without significant differences in branching angles. The relative distribution of volume in the alveolar ducts was similar across both age groups. The method has been demonstrated to be repeatable and robust to image noise and provides a new non-destructive technique to quantitatively assess and compare acinar morphometry.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 35%
Researcher 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 18%
Materials Science 2 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2017.
All research outputs
#22,760,732
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Physiology
#8,703
of 9,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,387
of 312,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Physiology
#54
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,077 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.