↓ Skip to main content

A robust and efficient curve skeletonization algorithm for tree-like objects using minimum cost paths

Overview of attention for article published in Pattern Recognition Letters, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A robust and efficient curve skeletonization algorithm for tree-like objects using minimum cost paths
Published in
Pattern Recognition Letters, April 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.patrec.2015.04.002
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Conventional curve skeletonization algorithms using the principle of Blum's transform, often, produce unwanted spurious branches due to boundary irregularities, digital effects, and other artifacts. This paper presents a new robust and efficient curve skeletonization algorithm for three-dimensional (3-D) elongated fuzzy objects using a minimum cost path approach, which avoids spurious branches without requiring post-pruning. Starting from a root voxel, the method iteratively expands the skeleton by adding new branches in each iteration that connects the farthest quench voxel to the current skeleton using a minimum cost path. The path-cost function is formulated using a novel measure of local significance factor defined by the fuzzy distance transform field, which forces the path to stick to the centerline of an object. The algorithm terminates when dilated skeletal branches fill the entire object volume or the current farthest quench voxel fails to generate a meaningful skeletal branch. Accuracy of the algorithm has been evaluated using computer-generated phantoms with known skeletons. Performance of the method in terms of false and missing skeletal branches, as defined by human experts, has been examined using in vivo CT imaging of human intrathoracic airways. Results from both experiments have established the superiority of the new method as compared to the existing methods in terms of accuracy as well as robustness in detecting true and false skeletal branches. The new algorithm makes a significant reduction in computation complexity by enabling detection of multiple new skeletal branches in one iteration. Specifically, this algorithm reduces the number of iterations from the number of terminal tree branches to the worst case performance of tree depth. In fact, experimental results suggest that, on an average, the order of computation complexity is reduced to the logarithm of the number of terminal branches of a tree-like object.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Morocco 1 1%
Unknown 66 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 31%
Student > Master 6 9%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Other 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 16 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 18 27%
Computer Science 17 25%
Physics and Astronomy 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 21 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,230,972
of 27,781,301 outputs
Outputs from Pattern Recognition Letters
#417
of 1,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,658
of 281,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pattern Recognition Letters
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,781,301 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,782 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them