↓ Skip to main content

Function and dynamics of macromolecular complexes explored by integrative structural and computational biology

Overview of attention for article published in Current Opinion in Structural Biology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Function and dynamics of macromolecular complexes explored by integrative structural and computational biology
Published in
Current Opinion in Structural Biology, September 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.sbi.2014.08.006
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Three vignettes exemplify the potential of combining EM and X-ray crystallographic data with molecular dynamics (MD) simulation to explore the architecture, dynamics and functional properties of multicomponent, macromolecular complexes. The first two describe how EM and X-ray crystallography were used to solve structures of the ribosome and the Arp2/3-actin complex, which enabled MD simulations that elucidated functional dynamics. The third describes how EM, X-ray crystallography, and microsecond MD simulations of a GPCR:G protein complex were used to explore transmembrane signaling by the β-adrenergic receptor. Recent technical advancements in EM, X-ray crystallography and computational simulation create unprecedented synergies for integrative structural biology to reveal new insights into heretofore intractable biological systems.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
Spain 2 3%
Czechia 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 54 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 30%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Professor 3 5%
Student > Master 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 4 6%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 25%
Physics and Astronomy 6 10%
Chemistry 6 10%
Computer Science 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 4 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2014.
All research outputs
#22,907,691
of 28,043,368 outputs
Outputs from Current Opinion in Structural Biology
#1,986
of 2,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,655
of 263,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Opinion in Structural Biology
#13
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,043,368 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.