↓ Skip to main content

Normal neuroanatomical variation due to age: The major lobes and a parcellation of the temporal region

Overview of attention for article published in Neurobiology of Aging, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
369 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Normal neuroanatomical variation due to age: The major lobes and a parcellation of the temporal region
Published in
Neurobiology of Aging, October 2005
DOI 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.05.023
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We used high-resolution MRI to investigate gray and white matter aging in the major lobes of the cerebrum (frontal, parietal, temporal, occipital) and the major sectors of the temporal lobe (temporal pole, superior temporal gyrus, infero-temporal region, parahippocampal gyrus, amygdala, hippocampus). Subjects included 87 adults between the ages of 22 and 88 years. Regions of interest were hand-traced on contiguous 1.5mm coronal slices. For the cerebrum in general, gray matter decreased linearly with age, resulting in a decline of about 9.1-9.8% between the ages of 30 and 70 years, and a decline of 11.3-12.3% by the age of 80. In contrast, white matter volume increased until the mid-50s, after which it declined at an accelerated rate. At 70 years, white matter volume was only 5.6-6.4% less than at 30 years, but by age 80, a cubic regression model predicted that the decrease would be 21.6-25.0%. Multivariate analyses indicate that the frontal gray matter was most strongly associated with age, while occipital gray and white matter were least associated. Reduction in volume in the hippocampus was best modeled by a cubic regression model rather than a linear model. No sex differences in aging were found for any regions of interest.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 369 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 10 3%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 345 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 21%
Researcher 70 19%
Student > Master 48 13%
Student > Bachelor 29 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 7%
Other 66 18%
Unknown 53 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 83 22%
Neuroscience 66 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 60 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 12%
Engineering 12 3%
Other 33 9%
Unknown 72 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,306,916
of 27,780,120 outputs
Outputs from Neurobiology of Aging
#2,345
of 4,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,627
of 78,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurobiology of Aging
#20
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,780,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.