↓ Skip to main content

From cord to caudate: characterizing umbilical cord blood stem cells and their paracrine interactions with the injured brain

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Research, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
From cord to caudate: characterizing umbilical cord blood stem cells and their paracrine interactions with the injured brain
Published in
Pediatric Research, November 2017
DOI 10.1038/pr.2017.251
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Stem cells are proving to be a promising therapy for a wide range of pediatric disorders, from neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy to pediatric leukemia. Due to their low immunogenicity and ease of availability, umbilical cord blood (UCB) progenitor cells are increasingly replacing fetal and adult-derived cells in therapeutic settings. Multiple environmental and demographic factors affect the number and type of stem cells extracted from UCB, and these differences have been associated with disparities in outcomes after transplantation. To avoid variations in efficacy, as well as the potential adverse effects of stem cell transplantation, evaluation of the stem cell secretome is critical to identify key paracrine signals released by the stem cells that could be utilized to provide similar neuroprotective effects to stem cell transplantation. This article describes the cell types found in UCB and reviews the available literature surrounding the effects of collection timing and volume, maternal risk factors, delivery characteristics, and neonatal demographics on the cellular composition of UCB. In addition, the current findings regarding the stem cell secretome are discussed to identify factors that could be used to supplement or replace stem cell transplantation in pediatric neuroprotection.Pediatric Research accepted article preview online, 05 October 2017. doi:10.1038/pr.2017.251.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 17%
Student > Master 9 15%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 20 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 22 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2017.
All research outputs
#8,748,700
of 26,874,583 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Research
#2,042
of 5,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,117
of 344,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Research
#30
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,874,583 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.