↓ Skip to main content

Facilitators and barriers to implementing antimicrobial stewardship strategies: Results from a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Infection Control, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Facilitators and barriers to implementing antimicrobial stewardship strategies: Results from a qualitative study
Published in
American Journal of Infection Control, October 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.04.023
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Many hospitals have implemented antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) and have included in their programs strategies such as prior authorization and audit and feedback. However there are few data concerning the facilitators and barriers that ASPs face when implementing their strategies. We conducted a qualitative study to discern factors that lead to successful uptake of ASP strategies.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 178 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Researcher 17 9%
Other 11 6%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Other 35 19%
Unknown 60 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 23%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 27 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 63 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,806,378
of 32,375,021 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Infection Control
#1,108
of 4,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,235
of 286,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Infection Control
#8
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,375,021 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.