Fractional flow reserve versus angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention: An updated systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions (Formerly Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis), October 2017

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 13 X users

Readers on

mendeley: 54 Mendeley

So far, Altmetric has seen 15 X posts from 13 X users, with an upper bound of 98,121 followers.

RT @CardioTargets: Fractional flow reserve versus angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention: An updated systematic review. http…

Fractional flow reserve versus angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention: An updated systematic review. https://t.co/tkdbgjRRyT

RT @ACSCardiology: Fractional flow reserve versus angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention: An updated systematic review - Ene…

RT @ArieBlitzMD: Fractional flow reserve versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: An updated systematic review→https:/…

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output. Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 11 additional X posts.