↓ Skip to main content

Functional Imaging Reveals Visual Modulation of Specific Fields in Auditory Cortex

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroscience, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
325 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Functional Imaging Reveals Visual Modulation of Specific Fields in Auditory Cortex
Published in
Journal of Neuroscience, February 2007
DOI 10.1523/jneurosci.4737-06.2007
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Merging the information from different senses is essential for successful interaction with real-life situations. Indeed, sensory integration can reduce perceptual ambiguity, speed reactions, or change the qualitative sensory experience. It is widely held that integration occurs at later processing stages and mostly in higher association cortices; however, recent studies suggest that sensory convergence can occur in primary sensory cortex. A good model for early convergence proved to be the auditory cortex, which can be modulated by visual and tactile stimulation; however, given the large number and small size of auditory fields, neither human imaging nor microelectrode recordings have systematically identified which fields are susceptible to multisensory influences. To reconcile findings from human imaging with anatomical knowledge from nonhuman primates, we exploited high-resolution imaging (functional magnetic resonance imaging) of the macaque monkey to study the modulation of auditory processing by visual stimulation. Using a functional parcellation of auditory cortex, we localized modulations to individual fields. Our results demonstrate that both primary (core) and nonprimary (belt) auditory fields can be activated by the mere presentation of visual scenes. Audiovisual convergence was restricted to caudal fields [prominently the core field (primary auditory cortex) and belt fields (caudomedial field, caudolateral field, and mediomedial field)] and continued in the auditory parabelt and the superior temporal sulcus. The same fields exhibited enhancement of auditory activation by visual stimulation and showed stronger enhancement for less effective stimuli, two characteristics of sensory integration. Together, these findings reveal multisensory modulation of auditory processing prominently in caudal fields but also at the lowest stages of auditory cortical processing.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 325 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 11 3%
United Kingdom 6 2%
Netherlands 4 1%
France 4 1%
Japan 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 287 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 91 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 22%
Professor 26 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 26 8%
Student > Master 23 7%
Other 54 17%
Unknown 35 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 83 26%
Neuroscience 72 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 5%
Engineering 12 4%
Other 25 8%
Unknown 59 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2014.
All research outputs
#31,219,024
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#22,306
of 23,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,200
of 130,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#206
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.