↓ Skip to main content

Radical‐Based C−C Bond‐Forming Processes Enabled by the Photoexcitation of 4‐Alkyl‐1,4‐dihydropyridines

Overview of attention for article published in Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 X users

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Radical‐Based C−C Bond‐Forming Processes Enabled by the Photoexcitation of 4‐Alkyl‐1,4‐dihydropyridines
Published in
Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, October 2017
DOI 10.1002/anie.201709571
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We report herein that 4-alkyl-1,4-dihydropyridines (alkyl-DHPs) can directly reach an electronically excited state upon light absorption and trigger the generation of C(sp3)-centered radicals without the need for an external photocatalyst. Selective excitation with a violet-light-emitting diode turns alkyl-DHPs into strong reducing agents that can activate reagents via single-electron transfer manifolds while undergoing a homolytic cleavage to generate radicals. We used this photochemical dual-reactivity profile to trigger radical-based carbon-carbon bond-forming processes, including nickel catalyzed cross-coupling reactions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 131 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 23%
Student > Master 17 13%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 4%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 40 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 82 63%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 42 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2019.
All research outputs
#3,226,304
of 34,372,222 outputs
Outputs from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#7,175
of 61,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,839
of 371,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#148
of 790 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 61,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 790 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.