↓ Skip to main content

Targeted Neonatal Echocardiography Services

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Targeted Neonatal Echocardiography Services
Published in
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, October 2014
DOI 10.7863/ultra.33.10.1833
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Targeted neonatal echocardiography refers to a focused assessment of myocardial performance and hemodynamics directed by a specific clinical question. It has become the standard of care in many parts of the world, but practice is variable, and there has been a lack of standardized training and evaluation to date. Targeted neonatal echocardiography was first introduced to Canada in 2006. The purpose of this study was to examine the characteristics of targeted neonatal echocardiography practice and training methods in Canadian neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 13 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 17 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2014.
All research outputs
#20,095,348
of 24,701,898 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
#1,729
of 2,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,739
of 259,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
#26
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,701,898 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.