↓ Skip to main content

Perceived Benefits and Barriers of Heart Failure Self-Care During and After Hospitalization

Overview of attention for article published in Home healthcare nurse, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Perceived Benefits and Barriers of Heart Failure Self-Care During and After Hospitalization
Published in
Home healthcare nurse, September 2014
DOI 10.1097/nhh.0000000000000125
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This longitudinal study describes the heart failure (HF) patient's perceived benefits and barriers to self-care during hospitalization, 1 week, and 1 month after hospitalization. Seventy-eight patients with acute HF completed the Health Belief Scales to determine the greatest benefits and barriers to self-care at each time point. Findings suggest that early benefits to performing self-care include reducing symptoms and improving quality of life. Later benefits focus more on promoting health. Barriers to self-care include forgetfulness and knowledge deficits about self-care behaviors. At 1 month, 15.1% to 48.5% patients reported that monitoring increases worry about HF. Home care clinicians can promote self-care through education and skills training.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 15 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 24%
Social Sciences 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 16 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2014.
All research outputs
#24,122,808
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Home healthcare nurse
#225
of 491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,724
of 280,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Home healthcare nurse
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 491 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.