| Title |
Nonsmokers’ responses to new warning labels on smokeless tobacco and electronic cigarettes: an experimental study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-997 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lucy Popova, Pamela M Ling |
| Abstract |
Graphic warning labels are a tobacco control best practice that is mandated in the US for cigarettes under the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. However, smokeless tobacco products are not required to carry graphic warning labels, and as of September 2014, electronic cigarettes in the US carry no warning labels and are aggressively marketed, including with "reduced harm" or "FDA Approved" messages. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 22% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Jamaica | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 24 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 92% |
| Scientists | 4 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 20% |
| Unknown | 18 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 20 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 30 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2022.
All research outputs
#947,389
of 25,578,098 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,029
of 17,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,800
of 263,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#21
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,578,098 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.