↓ Skip to main content

Central nervous system complications after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Overview of attention for article published in Future Oncology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Central nervous system complications after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Published in
Future Oncology, October 2017
DOI 10.2217/fon-2017-0274
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) is a potentially curative modality of treatment for patients with hematological malignancies. However, CNS complications following transplant pose a risk to survival of the patients. Early recognition and management of these complications are crucial to reduce morbidity and mortality of patients following transplant. Early CNS complications associated with alloSCT are infection, cerebrovascular events, chemotherapy and radiation-induced toxicities while late complications include post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, CNS relapse of underlying malignancy and viral and fungal infections. Development of graft-versus-host disease can further increase the risk of CNS complications and outcomes after alloSCT. Strategies aimed to reduce the risk of CNS complications and early management may ameliorate the morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 19 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 31%
Neuroscience 5 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 18 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2018.
All research outputs
#27,870,100
of 34,517,649 outputs
Outputs from Future Oncology
#1,999
of 2,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,506
of 362,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Future Oncology
#37
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,517,649 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.