↓ Skip to main content

Genomic Organization of TBK1 Copy Number Variations in Glaucoma Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Glaucoma, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Genomic Organization of TBK1 Copy Number Variations in Glaucoma Patients
Published in
Journal of Glaucoma, December 2017
DOI 10.1097/ijg.0000000000000792
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Approximately 1% of normal tension glaucoma cases are caused by TANK binding kinase 1 (TBK1) gene duplications and triplications. However, the precise borders and orientation of these TBK1 gene copy number variations (CNVs) on chromosome 12 are unknown. We determined the exact borders of TBK1 CNVs and the orientation of duplicated or triplicated DNA segments in five NTG patients with different TBK1 mutations using whole genome sequencing. Tandemly duplicated chromosome segments spanning the TBK1 gene were detected in four NTG patients, each with unique borders. Four of five CNVs had borders located within interspersed repetitive DNA sequences (Alu and LINE-L1 elements), suggesting that mismatched homologous recombinations likely generated these CNVs. A fifth NTG patient had a complex rearrangement including triplication of a chromosome segment spanning the TBK1 gene. No specific mutation hot-spots for TBK1 CNVs were detected, however, interspersed repetitive sequences (i.e. Alu-elements) were identified at the borders of TBK1 CNVs, which suggests that mismatch of these elements during meiosis may be the mechanism that generated TBK1 gene dosage mutations.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 21%
Researcher 2 14%
Other 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 14%
Computer Science 1 7%
Neuroscience 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2017.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Glaucoma
#2,284
of 2,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#338,762
of 444,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Glaucoma
#14
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,829 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.