A number of new period gene (per) mutants were generated by in vitro mutagenesis and germ line transformation. Missense mutations were made at amino acid 589, which is altered in the 19 h short-period (per(s)) mutant, and insertion mutations were generated with peptides commonly used for epitope tagging. Most of these new per mutants had short behavioral rhythms. Flies with heteroallelic combinations of these new mutant per genes were found to have "hybrid" periods, i.e., they had values that were usually in between those of the individual alleles. These findings suggest that short-period per mutants are not unusual gain-of-function mutants but rather more traditional loss-of-function mutants that are unable to influence the circadian pacemaker in a proper manner. The data also suggest that the per protein may engage in important intermolecular interactions.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2017.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurogenetics
#301
of 398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,953
of 122,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurogenetics
#54
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 398 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
