↓ Skip to main content

Surgical Interventions in Infants Born Preterm with Congenital Heart Defects: An Analysis of the Kids' Inpatient Database

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatrics, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Surgical Interventions in Infants Born Preterm with Congenital Heart Defects: An Analysis of the Kids' Inpatient Database
Published in
Journal of Pediatrics, September 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.07.015
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To evaluate short-term outcomes in infants born preterm with congenital heart defects (CHDs) and the factors associated with surgery, survival, and length of hospitalization in this population. We analyzed data from infants born preterm (gestational age <37 weeks) enrolled in the multicenter Kids' Inpatient Database of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project who were admitted to the hospital within 30 days after birth. Infants with atrial septal defects were excluded. Of 1 429 762 enrolled infants born preterm, 27 434 (2.0%) with CHDs were included. Overall survival to discharge was 90.5%; 74.0% among infants with critical CHDs and 45.7% among infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Cardiac surgeries were performed in 12.2% of all infants born preterm. Rates of surgical intervention for infants with critical CHDs were lower for very low birth weight (≤1.5 kg) vs larger infants >1.5 kg (27% vs 44%), and only 6.3% of infants born with very low birth weight underwent surgeries in Risk-adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery categories 4 or greater. Greater birth weight, left-sided lesions, care at children's hospitals, and absence of trisomies were associated with a greater likelihood of surgery. Birth weight <2 kg, nonwhite race, trisomy syndromes, prematurity-related morbidities, and Risk-adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery category 4 or greater were independent predictors of mortality. Birth weight <2 kg, Risk-adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery category, morbidities, and sidedness of lesion predicted length of stay. The high survival rates of infants born preterm with CHDs suggests that a cautiously optimistic approach to surgery may be warranted in all but the most immature infants with the greatest-risk conditions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 21 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Mathematics 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 24 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2018.
All research outputs
#5,031,144
of 34,372,222 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatrics
#3,334
of 15,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,539
of 359,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatrics
#22
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.