↓ Skip to main content

The ‘Evo-Demo’ Implications of Condition-Dependent Mortality

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Ecology & Evolution, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The ‘Evo-Demo’ Implications of Condition-Dependent Mortality
Published in
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, October 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2017.09.003
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Animals in the wild die from a variety of different mortality sources, including predation, disease, and starvation. Different mortality sources selectively remove individuals with different body condition in different ways, and this variation in the condition dependence of mortality has evolutionary and demographic implications. Subsequent population dynamics are influenced by the strength of condition-dependent mortality during specific periods, with population growth impacted in different ways in short- versus long-lived species. The evolution of lifespan is strongly influenced by condition-dependent mortality, with strikingly different outcomes expected in senescence rates when the relationship between condition and mortality is altered. A coupling of field and laboratory studies is now required to further reveal the evolutionary implications of condition-dependent mortality.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 21%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 61%
Environmental Science 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 21 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2017.
All research outputs
#7,781,300
of 30,043,550 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#2,207
of 3,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,633
of 339,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#25
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,043,550 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,565 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.