| Title |
Delays in diagnosis of young females with symptomatic cervical cancer in England: an interview-based study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp14x681757 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anita W Lim, Amanda J Ramirez, William Hamilton, Peter Sasieni, Julietta Patnick, Lindsay JL Forbes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 179 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 12% |
| Researcher | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 33 | 18% |
| Unknown | 54 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 6% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Unknown | 63 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,096,676
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,021
of 4,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,680
of 264,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#8
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.