↓ Skip to main content

Older and Younger Adults' First Impressions From Faces: Similar in Agreement but Different in Positivity

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology and Aging, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Older and Younger Adults' First Impressions From Faces: Similar in Agreement but Different in Positivity
Published in
Psychology and Aging, January 2013
DOI 10.1037/a0030927
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leslie A. Zebrowitz, Robert G. Franklin, Suzanne Hillman, Henry Boc

Abstract

People readily form first impressions from faces, with consensual judgments that have significant social consequences. Similar impressions are shown by children, young adults (YA), and people from diverse cultures. However, this is the first study to systematically investigate older adults' (OA) impressions. OA and YA showed similar levels of within-age agreement in their impressions of competence, health, hostility, and trustworthiness. Both groups also showed stronger within- than between-age agreement. Consistent with other evidence for age-related increases in positivity, OA showed more positive impressions of the health, hostility, and trustworthiness of faces. These effects tended to be strongest for the most negatively valenced faces, suggesting that they derive from OA lesser processing of negative cues rather than greater processing of positive cues. An own-age bias in impressions was limited to greater OA positivity in impressions of the hostility of older faces, but not younger ones. Although OA and YA differed in vision and executive function, only OA slower processing speed contributed to age differences in impression positivity. Positivity effects in OA have not been previously linked to processing speed, and research investigating possible explanations for this effect would be worthwhile.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Trinidad and Tobago 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Unknown 130 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 15%
Student > Bachelor 20 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 10%
Researcher 12 9%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 30 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 76 56%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 4%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 35 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2020.
All research outputs
#12,296,791
of 34,265,936 outputs
Outputs from Psychology and Aging
#750
of 1,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,424
of 345,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology and Aging
#18
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,265,936 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,495 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.