↓ Skip to main content

Depressive Symptoms, Antidepressant Medication Use, and Inflammatory Markers in the Diabetes Prevention Program

Overview of attention for article published in Biopsychosocial Science and Medicine (BSAM), February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Depressive Symptoms, Antidepressant Medication Use, and Inflammatory Markers in the Diabetes Prevention Program
Published in
Biopsychosocial Science and Medicine (BSAM), February 2018
DOI 10.1097/psy.0000000000000535
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Antidepressant medication use (ADM) has been shown to predict diabetes. This paper assessed the role of inflammatory markers in this relationship within the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP). DPP participants randomized to Metformin (MET), Lifestyle Intervention (ILS) or placebo (PLB) were assessed for depression (BDI; Beck Depression Inventory) annually; ADM use semi-annually; serum inflammatory markers (CRP, IL-6) at baseline and Year 1; and diagnosis of T2DM semi-annually (over 3.2 years). At baseline (N=3,187), mean BMI was 34 kg/m (S.D. 6) and the median BDI score was 3 [interquartile range: 1-7]. 181 (5.7%) reported ADM use and 328 (10%) had BDI scores of >11. CRP and IL-6 levels did not differ by treatment group.Baseline ADM, but not BDI score, was associated with higher levels of baseline CRP adjusted for demographic, anthropometric variables, and other medications (20% higher, p=0.01). Year 1 CRP decreased for non-ADM users in the MET (-13.2%) and ILS (-34%) groups and ADM users in the ILS group (-29%). No associations were found with IL-6.CRP and continuous use of ADM predicted incident T2DM in the PLB group. In the ILS group, continuous and intermittent ADM, but not CRP, predicted T2DM. In the MET group, CRP predicted incident T2DM. CRP did not mediate the risk of T2DM with ADM use in any group. ADM was significantly associated with elevated CRP and incident T2DM. In the PLB group, ADM and CRP independently predicted onset of T2DM, however CRP did not significantly mediate the effect of ADM.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 136 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Student > Master 15 11%
Researcher 10 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 58 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Psychology 12 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 1%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 65 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2017.
All research outputs
#21,315,866
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Biopsychosocial Science and Medicine (BSAM)
#2,084
of 2,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#279,235
of 492,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biopsychosocial Science and Medicine (BSAM)
#19
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 492,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.