↓ Skip to main content

Structural basis for the specific recognition of IL‐18 by its alpha receptor

Overview of attention for article published in Febs Letters, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Structural basis for the specific recognition of IL‐18 by its alpha receptor
Published in
Febs Letters, September 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.09.019
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Interleukin 18 (IL-18), a member of the IL-1 family of cytokines, is an important regulator of innate and acquired immune responses. It signals through its ligand-binding primary receptor IL-18Rα and accessory receptor IL-18Rβ. Here we report the crystal structure of IL-18 with the ectodomain of IL-18Rα, which reveals the structural basis for their specific recognition. It confirms that surface charge complementarity determines the ligand-binding specificity of primary receptors in the IL-1 receptor family. We suggest that IL-18 signaling complex adopts an architecture similar to other agonistic cytokines and propose a general ligand-receptor assembly and activation model for the IL-1 family.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 39 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 25%
Chemistry 4 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,942,462
of 34,518,147 outputs
Outputs from Febs Letters
#1,780
of 17,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,984
of 296,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Febs Letters
#7
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,147 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.