↓ Skip to main content

Impact of Selection Bias on Estimation of Subsequent Event Risk

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Impact of Selection Bias on Estimation of Subsequent Event Risk
Published in
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine, October 2017
DOI 10.1161/circgenetics.116.001616
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi-Juan Hu, Amand F. Schmidt, Frank Dudbridge, Michael V. Holmes, James M. Brophy, Vinicius Tragante, Ziyi Li, Peizhou Liao, Arshed A. Quyyumi, Raymond O. McCubrey, Benjamin D. Horne, Aroon D. Hingorani, Folkert W. Asselbergs, Riyaz S. Patel, Qi Long, Axel Åkerblom, Ale Algra, Hooman Allayee, Peter Almgren, Jeffrey L. Anderson, Maria G. Andreassi, Chiara V. Anselmi, Diego Ardissino, Benoit J. Arsenault, Christie M. Ballantyne, Ekaterina V. Baranova, Hassan Behloui, Thomas O. Bergmeijer, Connie R. Bezzina, Eythor Bjornsson, Simon C. Body, Bram Boeckx, Eric (H.) Boersma, Eric Boerwinkle, Peter Bogaty, Peter S. Braund, Lutz P. Breitling, Hermann Brenner, Carlo Briguori, Jasper J. Brugts, Ralph Burkhardt, Vicky A. Cameron, John F. Carlquist, Clara Carpeggiani, Kathryn F. Carruthers, Gavino Casu, Gianluigi Condorelli, Sharon Cresci, Nicolas Danchin, Ulf de Faire, John Deanfield, Graciela Delgado, Panos Deloukas, Kenan Direk, Robert N. Doughty, Heinz Drexel, Nubia E. Duarte, Marie-Pierre Dubé, Line Dufresne, James C. Engert, Niclas Eriksson, Natalie Fitzpatrick, Luisa Foco, Ian Ford, Keith A.A. Fox, Bruna Gigante, Crystel M. Gijsberts, Domenico Girelli, Yan Gong, Daniel F. Gudbjartsson, Emil Hagström, Jaana Hartiala, Stanley L. Hazen, Claes Held, Anna Helgadottir, Harry Hemingway, Mahyar Heydarpour, Imo E. Hoefer, Kees Hovingh, Jaroslav A. Hubacek, Stefan James, Julie A. Johnson, J. Wouter Jukema, Marcin P. Kaczor, Karol A. Kaminski, Jiri Kettner, Marek Kiliszek, Marcus Kleber, Olaf H. Klungel, Daniel Kofink, Mika Kohonen, Salma Kotti, Pekka Kuukasjärvi, Bo Lagerqvist, Diether Lambrechts, Chim C. Lang, Jari O. Laurikka, Karin Leander, Vei-Vei Lee, Terho Lehtimäki, Andreas Leiherer, Petra A. Lenzini, Daniel Levin, Daniel Lindholm, Marja-Liisa Lokki, Paulo A. Lotufo, Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen, B. Khan Mahmoodi, Anke H. Maitland-van der Zee, Nicola Martinelli, Winfried März, Nicola Marziliano, Ruth McPherson, Olle Melander, Ute Mons, Jochen D. Muehlschlegel, Joseph B. Muhlestein, Cristopher P. Nelson, Chris Newton Cheh, Oliviero Olivieri, Grzegorz Opolski, Colin N. Palmer, Guillaume Pare, Gerard Pasterkamp, Carl J. Pepine, Witold Pepinski, Alexandre C. Pereira, Anna P. Pilbrow, Louise Pilote, Jan Pitha, Rafal Ploski, A. Mark Richards, Christoph H. Saely, Nilesh J. Samani, Ayman Samman-Tahhan, Marek Sanak, Pratik B. Sandesara, Naveed Sattar, Markus Scholz, Agneta Siegbahn, Tabassome Simon, Juha Sinisalo, J. Gustav Smith, John A. Spertus, Kari Stefansson, Alexandre F.R. Stewart, David J. Stott, Wojciech Szczeklik, Anna Szpakowicz, Michael W.T. Tanck, Wilson H. Tang, Jean-Claude Tardif, Jur M. ten Berg, Andrej Teren, George Thanassoulis, Joachim Thiery, Gudmundur Thorgeirsson, Gudmar Thorleifsson, Unnur Thorsteinsdottir, Adam Timmis, Stella Trompet, Frans van de Werf, Yolanda van der Graaf, Pim van der Haarst, Sander W. van der Laan, Ragnar O. Vilmundarson, Salim S. Virani, Frank L.J. Visseren, Efthymia Vlachopoulou, Lars Wallentin, Johannes Waltenberger, Els Wauters, Arthur A.M. Wilde

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 20%
Professor 12 15%
Other 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 29 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 37 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2018.
All research outputs
#27,928,029
of 34,601,305 outputs
Outputs from Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
#1,029
of 1,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,450
of 362,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
#15
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,601,305 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,228 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.