↓ Skip to main content

The Rate of Torque Development: A Unique, Non-invasive Indicator of Eccentric-induced Muscle Damage?

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Sports Medicine, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Rate of Torque Development: A Unique, Non-invasive Indicator of Eccentric-induced Muscle Damage?
Published in
International Journal of Sports Medicine, September 2014
DOI 10.1055/s-0034-1375696
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This study examined the time courses of recovery for isometric peak torque and rate of torque development (RTD) after eccentric-induced muscle damage. 18 men completed 6 sets of 10 maximal eccentric isokinetic muscle actions at 30° · s(-1). Peak torque, peak RTD and RTD at 10 (RTD10), 50 (RTD50), 100 (RTD100) and 200 ms (RTD200), serum creatine kinase and lactate dehydrogenase were measured before (PRE), immediately after (POST), 24, 48 and 72 h after eccentric exercise. Creatine kinase and lactate dehydrogenase increased from 139 to 6 457 and from 116 to 199 IU · L(-1) from PRE to 72 h, respectively. Peak torque and all RTDs decreased at POST. Peak torque and RTD200 remained lower than PRE through 72 h. Peak RTD remained lower than PRE through 48 h, but was not different from PRE at 72 h. RTD10 and RTD100 were lower than PRE through 24 h, but were not different from PRE at 48 and 72 h. RTD50 decreased at POST, but was not different from PRE at 24 h. Early phase RTDs recovered more quickly than PT and RTD200. Early phase RTDs may reflect neural mechanisms underlying eccentric-induced force decrements, while late RTDs may describe the same physiological mechanisms as PT.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 83 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 19%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Professor 6 7%
Other 5 6%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 16 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 41 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 24 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2016.
All research outputs
#20,625,103
of 29,591,028 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Sports Medicine
#1,803
of 2,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,229
of 269,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Sports Medicine
#28
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,591,028 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.