↓ Skip to main content

Bat flight height monitored from wind masts predicts mortality risk at wind farms

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Bat flight height monitored from wind masts predicts mortality risk at wind farms
Published in
Biological Conservation, November 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.09.002
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 180 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 19%
Other 24 13%
Student > Master 21 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 53 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 38%
Environmental Science 50 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 55 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,955,662
of 28,573,925 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#4,459
of 7,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,835
of 348,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#50
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,573,925 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,384 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.5. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.