To assess diagnostic performance of subjective assessment (SA) by level II ultrasound examiners for predicting the specific histology of adnexal masses METHODS AND MATERIALS: Prospective multicenter cross-sectional study. Women older than 16 years with at least one adnexal mass were included and underwent transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) by level II examiners who were familiar with the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group definitions of ultrasound features of ovarian masses.. Final outcome was histology.. Specific diagnoses were divided into 17 groups. Agreement between SA and histology was measured using un-weighted kappa coefficients. Sensitivities and specificities for SA were obtained.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2018.
All research outputs
#8,764,021
of 27,367,745 outputs
Outputs from Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
#1,611
of 3,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,842
of 282,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
#15
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,367,745 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
