↓ Skip to main content

Delayed Laparotomy After Selective Non‐operative Management of Penetrating Abdominal Injuries

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Delayed Laparotomy After Selective Non‐operative Management of Penetrating Abdominal Injuries
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00268-014-2813-7
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Main concern during the practice of selective non-operative management (SNOM) for abdominal stab wounds (SW) and gunshot wounds (GSW) is the potential for harm in patients who fail SNOM and receive a delayed laparotomy (DL). The aim of this study is to determine whether such patients suffer adverse sequelae because of delays in diagnosis and treatment when managed under a structured SNOM protocol.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 26%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 8 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Mathematics 1 5%
Linguistics 1 5%
Unknown 10 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2016.
All research outputs
#7,446,748
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#1,497
of 4,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,557
of 253,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#18
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.