↓ Skip to main content

The polycomb group gene EMF2B is essential for maintenance of floral meristem determinacy in rice

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Journal, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The polycomb group gene EMF2B is essential for maintenance of floral meristem determinacy in rice
Published in
Plant Journal, November 2014
DOI 10.1111/tpj.12688
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) represses transcriptional activity of target genes through trimethylation of Lysine 27 of Histone H3. The functions of the plant PRC2 have been chiefly described in Arabidopsis but specific functions in other plant species, especially the cereals, are still largely unknown. Here we characterize mutants in the rice EMF2B gene, an ortholog of the Arabidopsis EMBRYONIC FLOWER2 (EMF2) gene. Loss of EMF2B in rice results in complete sterility, and mutant flowers have severe floral organ defects and indeterminacy that resemble loss of function mutants in E-function floral organ specification genes. Transcriptome analysis identified the E-function genes OsMADS1, OsMADS6 and OsMADS34 as differentially expressed in the emf2b mutant compared to wild type. OsMADS1 and OsMADS6 known to be required for meristem determinacy in rice, have reduced expression in the emf2b mutant, whereas OsMADS34 which interacts genetically with OsMADS1 was ectopically expressed. Chromatin immunoprecipitation for H3K27me3 followed by qRT-PCR showed that all three genes are presumptive targets of the PRC2 in the meristem. Therefore, in rice, and possibly other cereals, the PRC2 appears to play a major role in floral meristem determinacy through modulation of the expression of E-function genes. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 20%
Student > Master 6 11%
Professor 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 15 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 25%
Mathematics 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 15 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2016.
All research outputs
#24,753,774
of 34,360,889 outputs
Outputs from Plant Journal
#7,482
of 8,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,309
of 422,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Journal
#54
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.