↓ Skip to main content

Longitudinal CSF biomarkers in patients with early Parkinson disease and healthy controls

Overview of attention for article published in Neurology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Longitudinal CSF biomarkers in patients with early Parkinson disease and healthy controls
Published in
Neurology, October 2017
DOI 10.1212/wnl.0000000000004609
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brit Mollenhauer, Chelsea J. Caspell-Garcia, Christopher S. Coffey, Peggy Taylor, Leslie M. Shaw, John Q. Trojanowski, Andy Singleton, Mark Frasier, Kenneth Marek, Douglas Galasko, Kenneth Marek, Danna Jennings, Shirley Lasch, Caroline Tanner, Tanya Simuni, Christopher Coffey, Karl Kieburtz, Renee Wilson, Werner Poewe, Brit Mollenhauer, Tatiana Foroud, Todd Sherer, Sohini Chowdhury, Mark Frasier, Catherine Kopil, Vanessa Arnedo, Alice Rudolph, Cynthia Casaceli, John Seibyl, Susan Mendick, Norbert Schuff, Chelsea Caspell, Liz Uribe, Eric Foster, Katherine Gloer, Jon Yankey, Arthur Toga, Karen Crawford, Paola Casalin, Giulia Malferrari, Brit Mollenhauer, Douglas Galasko, Andrew Singleton, Keith A. Hawkins, David Russell, Stewart Factor, Penelope Hogarth, David Standaert, Robert Hauser, Joseph Jankovic, Matthew Stern, Lana Chahine, James Leverenz, Samuel Frank, Irene Richard, Klaus Seppi, Holly Shill, Hubert Fernandez, Daniela Berg, Isabel Wurster, Douglas Galasko, Zoltan Mari, David Brooks, Nicola Pavese, Paolo Barone, Stuart Isaacson, Alberto Espay, Dominic Rowe, Melanie Brandabur, James Tetrud, Grace Liang, Alex Iranzo, Eduardo Tolosa, Laura Leary, Cheryl Riordan, Linda Rees, Alicia Portillo, Art Lenahan, Karen Williams, Stephanie Guthrie, Ashlee Rawlins, Sherry Harlan, Christine Hunter, Baochan Tran, Abigail Darin, Carly Linder, Marne Baca, Heli Venkov, Cathi-Ann Thomas, Raymond James, Cheryl Deeley, Courtney Bishop, Fabienne Sprenger, Diana Willeke, Sanja Obradov, Jennifer Mule, Nancy Monahan, Katharina Gauss, Deborah Fontaine, Christina Gigliotti, Arita McCoy, Becky Dunlop, Bina Shah, Ainscough Susan, Angela James, Rebecca Silverstein, Kristy Espay, Madelaine Ranola, Kenneth Marek, Investigator, Danna Jennings, Shirley Lasch, Andrew Siderowf, Tanner Caroline, Tanya Simuni, Chris Coffey, Karl Kieburtz, Emily Flagg, Sohini Chowdhury, Werner Poewe, Brit Mollenhauer, Todd Sherer, Mark Frasier, Claire Meunier, Alice Rudolph, Cindy Casaceli, John Seibyl, Investigator, Susan Mendick, Norbert Schuff, Ying Zhang, Arthur Toga, Karen Crawford, Alison Ansbach, Pas-quale De Blasio, Michele Piovella, John Trojanowski, Les Shaw, Andrew Singleton, Keith Hawkins, J PsyDMichael, Jamie Eberling, Deborah Brooks, David Russell, Laura Leary, Stewart Factor, Barbara Sommerfeld, Penelope Hogarth, Emily Pighetti, Karen Williams, David Standaert, Stephanie Guthrie, Robert Hauser, Holly Delgado, Joseph Jankovic, Christine Hunter, Matthew Stern, Baochan Tran, Jim Leverenz, Marne Baca, Sam Frank, Cathi-Ann Thomas, Irene Richard, Cheryl Deeley, Linda Rees, Fabienne Sprenger, Wolfgang Oertel, Elisabeth Lang, Holly Shill, Sanja Obradov, Hubert Fernandez, Adrienna Winters, Daniela Berg, Katharina Gauss, Douglas Galasko, Deborah Fontaine, Zoltan Mari, Melissa Gerstenhaber, David Brooks, Sophie Malloy, Paolo Barone, Katia Longo, Tom Comery, Bernard Ravina, Igor Grachev, Kim Gallagher, Michelle Collins, Katherine L. Widnell, Suzanne Ostrowizki, Paulo Fontoura, F. Hoffmann La-Roche, Tony Ho, Johan Luthman, Marcel van der Brug, Alastair D. Reith, Peggy Taylor

Abstract

To analyze longitudinal levels of CSF biomarkers in drug-naive patients with Parkinson disease (PD) and healthy controls (HC), examine the extent to which these biomarker changes relate to clinical measures of PD, and identify what may influence them. CSF α-synuclein (α-syn), total and phosphorylated tau (t- and p-tau), and β-amyloid 1-42 (Aβ42) were measured at baseline and 6 and 12 months in 173 patients with PD and 112 matched HC in the international multicenter Parkinson's Progression Marker Initiative. Baseline clinical and demographic variables, PD medications, neuroimaging, and genetic variables were evaluated as potential predictors of CSF biomarker changes. CSF biomarkers were stable over 6 and 12 months, and there was a small but significant increase in CSF Aβ42 in both patients with patients with PD and HC from baseline to 12 months. The t-tau remained stable. The p-tau increased marginally more in patients with PD than in HC. α-syn remained relatively stable in patients with PD and HC. Ratios of p-tau/t-tau increased, while t-tau/Aβ42 decreased over 12 months in patients with PD. CSF biomarker changes did not correlate with changes in Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor scores or dopamine imaging. CSF α-syn levels at 12 months were lower in patients with PD treated with dopamine replacement therapy, especially dopamine agonists. These core CSF biomarkers remained stable over 6 and 12 months in patients with early PD and HC. PD medication use may influence CSF α-syn. Novel biomarkers are needed to better profile progressive neurodegeneration in PD.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 168 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 18%
Student > Master 24 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Other 10 6%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 50 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 30 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 6%
Psychology 9 5%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 66 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2017.
All research outputs
#4,772,196
of 32,435,668 outputs
Outputs from Neurology
#8,197
of 25,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,853
of 354,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurology
#99
of 327 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,435,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 327 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.