↓ Skip to main content

Sample size estimation for cluster randomized controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sample size estimation for cluster randomized controlled trials
Published in
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, October 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.10.002
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Cluster randomized controlled trials (cRCTs) are commonly used by clinical researchers. The advantages of cRCTs include preventing treatment contamination, enhancing administrative efficiency, convenience, external validity, ethical considerations, and likelihood of increased compliance by participants. However, when designing a cRCT, clinical researchers are faced with challenges, such as cluster units that may not have an equal number of participants within each. In this Technical Note, we discuss approaches for estimating the sample size, while taking into account unequal cluster sizes, and strategies for optimizing the design of cluster trials.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Master 8 12%
Lecturer 7 11%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 15 23%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Mathematics 3 5%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 21 32%