| Title |
What does impacted look like? High diversity and abundance of epibiota in modified estuaries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Pollution, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.09.017 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors | |
| Abstract |
Ecosystems modified by human activities are generally predicted to be biologically impoverished. However, much pollution impact theory stems from laboratory or small-scale field studies, and few studies replicate at the level of estuary. Furthermore, assessments are often based on sediment contamination and infauna, and impacts to epibiota (sessile invertebrates and algae) are seldom considered. We surveyed epibiota in six estuaries in south-east Australia. Half the estuaries were relatively pristine, and half were subject to internationally high levels of contamination, urbanisation, and industrialisation. Contrary to predictions, epibiota in modified estuaries had greater coverage and were similarly diverse as those in unmodified estuaries. Change in epibiota community structure was linearly correlated with sediment-bound copper, and the tubeworm Hydroides elegans showed a strong positive correlation with sediment metals. Stressors such as metal contamination can reduce biodiversity and productivity, but others such as nutrient enrichment and resource provision may obscure signals of impact. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Thailand | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 61 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 12 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 23 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 30% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 22% |