↓ Skip to main content

What does impacted look like? High diversity and abundance of epibiota in modified estuaries

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Pollution, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
What does impacted look like? High diversity and abundance of epibiota in modified estuaries
Published in
Environmental Pollution, October 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.09.017
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Ecosystems modified by human activities are generally predicted to be biologically impoverished. However, much pollution impact theory stems from laboratory or small-scale field studies, and few studies replicate at the level of estuary. Furthermore, assessments are often based on sediment contamination and infauna, and impacts to epibiota (sessile invertebrates and algae) are seldom considered. We surveyed epibiota in six estuaries in south-east Australia. Half the estuaries were relatively pristine, and half were subject to internationally high levels of contamination, urbanisation, and industrialisation. Contrary to predictions, epibiota in modified estuaries had greater coverage and were similarly diverse as those in unmodified estuaries. Change in epibiota community structure was linearly correlated with sediment-bound copper, and the tubeworm Hydroides elegans showed a strong positive correlation with sediment metals. Stressors such as metal contamination can reduce biodiversity and productivity, but others such as nutrient enrichment and resource provision may obscure signals of impact.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Thailand 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 61 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Student > Master 10 14%
Other 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 12 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 23 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 30%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 15 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,102,965
of 28,021,203 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Pollution
#869
of 14,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,391
of 269,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Pollution
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,021,203 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.