↓ Skip to main content

Ensuring Effective Medication Reconciliation in Home Healthcare

Overview of attention for article published in Home healthcare nurse, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Ensuring Effective Medication Reconciliation in Home Healthcare
Published in
Home healthcare nurse, October 2014
DOI 10.1097/nhh.0000000000000136
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A patient was readmitted two days after discharge with severe hypoglycemia. The treating team discharged the patient on a new insulin regimen without realizing that the patient also had insulin 70/30 at home. The patient continued to take her previous regimen as well as the new one, and was found unresponsive by her husband. The patient was in the ICU with the incident likely resulting in permanent neurological deficits. ()A patient was admitted to a hospital from a home health agency. The list of medications provided by the agency did not completely match the list provided by the patient's family physician (i.e., the antihypertensive agent metoprolol tartrate [Lopressor] was not listed by the agency as one of the medications that the patient was currently taking). Therefore, metoprolol tartrate was not initially ordered. The patient developed atrial fibrillation shortly after hospital admission and required a transfer to the ICU [intensive care unit]. A diltiazem (Cardizem) infusion was started and the patient's family physician became aware that the patient had not been receiving their antihypertensive medication and initiated an order for the metoprolol tartrate ().

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Student > Master 7 15%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 23%
Arts and Humanities 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 13 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2017.
All research outputs
#24,788,473
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Home healthcare nurse
#235
of 491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,119
of 298,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Home healthcare nurse
#7
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 491 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.