You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Moving Beyond Too Little, Too Late: Managing Emerging Infectious Diseases in Wild Populations Requires International Policy and Partnerships
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EcoHealth, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10393-014-0980-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jamie Voyles, A. Marm Kilpatrick, James P. Collins, Matthew C. Fisher, Winifred F. Frick, Hamish McCallum, Craig K. R. Willis, David S. Blehert, Kris A. Murray, Robert Puschendorf, Erica Bree Rosenblum, Benjamin M. Bolker, Tina L. Cheng, Kate E. Langwig, Daniel L. Lindner, Mary Toothman, Mark Q. Wilber, Cheryl J. Briggs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 5% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 134 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 22% |
| Researcher | 27 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 23 | 16% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 10 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 26 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2014.
All research outputs
#13,941,448
of 24,311,255 outputs
Outputs from EcoHealth
#489
of 730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,487
of 259,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EcoHealth
#17
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,311,255 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.