↓ Skip to main content

Cytotoxicity and cellular uptake of different sized gold nanoparticles in ovarian cancer cells

Overview of attention for article published in Nanotechnology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cytotoxicity and cellular uptake of different sized gold nanoparticles in ovarian cancer cells
Published in
Nanotechnology, November 2017
DOI 10.1088/1361-6528/aa935e
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Nanomedicine has advanced the biomedical field with the availability of multifunctional nanoparticle (NPs) systems that can target a disease site enabling drug delivery and helping to monitor the disease. In this paper, we synthesised the gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) with an average size 18, 40, 60 and 80 nm, and studied the effect of nanoparticles size, concentration and incubation time on ovarian cancer cells namely, OVCAR5, OVCAR8, and SKOV3. The size measured by transmission electron microscopy images was slightly smaller than the hydrodynamic diameter; measured size by ImageJ as 14.55 nm, 38.13 nm, 56.88 nm and 78.56 nm. The cellular uptake was significantly controlled by the AuNPs size, concentration, and the cell type. The nanoparticles uptake increased with increasing concentration, and 18 nm and 80 nm gold nanoparticles showed higher uptake ranging from 1.3 µg to 5.4 µg depending upon the concentration and cell type. The AuNPs were associated with a temporary reduction in metabolic activity, but metabolic activity remained more than 60% for all sample types; NPs significantly affected the cell proliferation activity in first 12 h. The increase in nanoparticle size and concentration induced the production of reactive oxygen species in 24 h.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 22%
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 13%
Chemistry 7 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Engineering 5 8%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 24 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2018.
All research outputs
#20,449,496
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Nanotechnology
#3,880
of 4,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,703
of 329,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nanotechnology
#45
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,536 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.