↓ Skip to main content

Implementing remote procedure calls

Overview of attention for article published in ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, February 1984
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 383)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
patent
213 patents
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
307 Mendeley
citeulike
16 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Implementing remote procedure calls
Published in
ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, February 1984
DOI 10.1145/2080.357392
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Remote magnetic catheter navigation (RCN) is gaining acceptance in clinical cardiac electrophysiology, but details regarding how RCN affects procedure execution are not well characterized.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 307 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 17 6%
Germany 9 3%
Taiwan 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 265 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 97 32%
Student > Master 68 22%
Researcher 37 12%
Student > Bachelor 24 8%
Other 17 6%
Other 28 9%
Unknown 36 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 229 75%
Engineering 29 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 <1%
Physics and Astronomy 2 <1%
Philosophy 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 39 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2026.
All research outputs
#1,668,014
of 34,362,729 outputs
Outputs from ACM Transactions on Computer Systems
#6
of 383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#346
of 48,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM Transactions on Computer Systems
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,362,729 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them