↓ Skip to main content

Inaccuracy of regression results in replacing bivariate correlations

Overview of attention for article published in Research Synthesis Methods, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Inaccuracy of regression results in replacing bivariate correlations
Published in
Research Synthesis Methods, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/jrsm.1126
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This manuscript considers discrepancies between the bivariate correlation and several indices of association estimated from regression results. These indices can be estimated from results typically reported in primary studies. In recent years, many researchers conducting meta-analyses have used these indices in place of, or together with, the bivariate correlation. I illustrate the differences among these indices and the bivariate correlation. I demonstrate the inaccuracy of these indices as replacements for bivariate effects. Thus, I recommend discontinuing the use of these indices and partial effect sizes as replacement for the bivariate correlation. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Macao 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 47 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 16 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 23%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 10%
Social Sciences 5 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 19 37%