↓ Skip to main content

Effect of baseline anxious depression on initial and sustained antidepressant response to ketamine.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
patent
20 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
3 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effect of baseline anxious depression on initial and sustained antidepressant response to ketamine.
Published in
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, September 2014
DOI 10.4088/jcp.14m09049
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Patients with anxious depression are typically more difficult to treat with monoaminergic antidepressants compared to those with nonanxious depression. Although novel research has shown that the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist ketamine has rapidly acting, relatively sustained effects in treating depression, we predicted that, consistent with the existent literature on traditional antidepressants, patients with anxious depression would have a poorer antidepressant response.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 125 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 16%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 34 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 20%
Psychology 17 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 8%
Neuroscience 9 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 48 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2026.
All research outputs
#4,105,457
of 33,979,905 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
#1,505
of 5,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,186
of 293,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
#16
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,979,905 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.