↓ Skip to main content

Randomized controlled trial of asthma risk with paracetamol use in infancy – a feasibility study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical & Experimental Allergy, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Randomized controlled trial of asthma risk with paracetamol use in infancy – a feasibility study
Published in
Clinical & Experimental Allergy, January 2015
DOI 10.1111/cea.12433
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

There is non-experimental evidence that paracetamol (acetaminophen) use may increase the risk of developing asthma. However, numerous methodological issues need to be resolved before undertaking a randomized controlled trial to investigate this hypothesis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 16%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 5%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Philosophy 1 2%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 15 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2015.
All research outputs
#7,349,675
of 29,043,514 outputs
Outputs from Clinical & Experimental Allergy
#1,814
of 4,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,703
of 373,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical & Experimental Allergy
#34
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,043,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.