↓ Skip to main content

Parkinsonian Gait Ameliorated With a Moving Handrail, Not With a Banister

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Parkinsonian Gait Ameliorated With a Moving Handrail, Not With a Banister
Published in
Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, October 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.07.427
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ely Rabin, Aleksandr Demin, Stefania Pirrotta, Jason Chen, Hemal Patel, Ankur Bhambri, Estella Noyola, James R. Lackner, Paul DiZio, Joanne DiFrancisco-Donoghue, William Werner

Abstract

To determine whether haptic (touch and proprioception) cues from touching a moving handrail while walking can ameliorate Parkinson's disease gait symptoms such as slowness and small stride-length.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 131 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Researcher 11 8%
Professor 9 7%
Other 7 5%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 51 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 14%
Neuroscience 10 8%
Sports and Recreations 6 5%
Psychology 5 4%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 54 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2018.
All research outputs
#21,627,637
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#5,233
of 7,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,777
of 298,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#72
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.