↓ Skip to main content

Vocal process granuloma

Overview of attention for article published in Head & Neck, December 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Vocal process granuloma
Published in
Head & Neck, December 2001
DOI 10.1002/hed.10014
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This review article reports the evolution of knowledge regarding the benign proliferations of the posterior glottis commonly termed "vocal process granuloma". A comprehensive review of publications addressing lesions of the posterior glottis is affected to analyze the contemporary management of vocal process granuloma. Contemporary management emphasizes interventions to decrease irritation to the posterior glottis. Multiple causes of this irritation preclude use of a single management plan that will successfully address all cases. Management to diminish laryngopharyngeal reflux, as well as to correct vocally abusive behavior, will appropriately address the majority of vocal process granuloma. Surgical removal is best reserved for cases when conservative management fails, when airway obstruction is a concern, or when a biopsy is needed to establish the diagnosis. Ancillary measures that may be beneficial in specific cases include the use of steroids, antibiotics, membranous vocal fold augmentation, and laryngeal botulinum neurotoxin injection.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Other 3 9%
Student > Master 2 6%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 12 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 15 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,610,295
of 34,492,055 outputs
Outputs from Head & Neck
#629
of 5,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,578
of 184,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Head & Neck
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,492,055 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,113 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.