↓ Skip to main content

Repurposing the Antihistamine Terfenadine for Antimicrobial Activity against Staphylococcus aureus

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Repurposing the Antihistamine Terfenadine for Antimicrobial Activity against Staphylococcus aureus
Published in
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, September 2014
DOI 10.1021/jm5010682
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a rapidly growing health threat in the U.S., with resistance to several commonly prescribed treatments. A high-throughput screen identified the antihistamine terfenadine to possess, previously unreported, antimicrobial activity against S. aureus and other Gram-positive bacteria. In an effort to repurpose this drug, structure-activity relationship studies yielded 84 terfenadine-based analogues with several modifications providing increased activity versus S. aureus and other bacterial pathogens, including Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mechanism of action studies revealed these compounds to exert their antibacterial effects, at least in part, through inhibition of the bacterial type II topoisomerases. This scaffold suffers from hERG liabilities which were not remedied through this round of optimization; however, given the overall improvement in activity of the set, terfenadine-based analogues provide a novel structural class of antimicrobial compounds with potential for further characterization as part of the continuing process to meet the current need for new antibiotics.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 102 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 15%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Student > Master 14 13%
Other 4 4%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 29 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 33 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 30 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2025.
All research outputs
#3,450,190
of 34,185,767 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
#4,018
of 28,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,354
of 292,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
#26
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,185,767 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.