Service providers’ perspectives, attitudes and beliefs on health services delivery for Aboriginal people receiving haemodialysis in rural Australia: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, October 2013

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy: 1 policy source

peer_reviews: 1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley: 134 Mendeley

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Article details
Title	Service providers’ perspectives, attitudes and beliefs on health services delivery for Aboriginal people receiving haemodialysis in rural Australia: a qualitative study
Published in	BMJ Open, October 2013
DOI	10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003581
Pubmed ID	24157820
Authors	Elizabeth F Rix, Lesley Barclay, Shawn Wilson, Janelle Stirling, Allison Tong
Abstract	Providing services to rural dwelling minority cultural groups with serious chronic disease is challenging due to access to care and cultural differences. This study aimed to describe service providers' perspectives on health services delivery for Aboriginal people receiving haemodialysis for end-stage kidney disease in rural Australia.

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
United Kingdom	1	<1%
Unknown	133	99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Master	28	21%
Student > Bachelor	18	13%
Student > Ph. D. Student	13	10%
Researcher	12	9%
Student > Doctoral Student	8	6%
Other	25	19%
Unknown	30	22%

Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Nursing and Health Professions	32	24%
Medicine and Dentistry	27	20%
Psychology	11	8%
Social Sciences	11	8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences	4	3%
Other	11	8%
Unknown	38	28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2018.

All research outputs

#7,771,806

of 26,587,829 outputs

Outputs from BMJ Open

#12,611

of 26,616 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#65,029

of 226,309 outputs

Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open

#101

of 232 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 26,587,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.

So far Altmetric has tracked 26,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.