↓ Skip to main content

Lactate and glucose interactions during rest and exercise in men: effect of exogenous lactate infusion

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physiology, November 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
241 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Lactate and glucose interactions during rest and exercise in men: effect of exogenous lactate infusion
Published in
Journal of Physiology, November 2002
DOI 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.027128
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To test the hypothesis that lactate plays a central role in the distribution of carbohydrate (CHO) potential energy for oxidation and glucose production (GP), we performed a lactate clamp (LC) procedure during rest and moderate intensity exercise. Blood [lactate] was clamped at approximately 4 mM by exogenous lactate infusion. Subjects performed 90 min exercise trials at 65 % of the peak rate of oxygen consumption (V(O(2))(,peak); 65 %), 55 % V(O(2))(,peak) (55 %) and 55 % V(O(2))(,peak) with lactate clamped to the blood [lactate] that was measured at 65 % V(O(2))(,peak) (55 %-LC). Lactate and glucose rates of appearance (R(a)), disappearance (R(d)) and oxidation (R(ox)) were measured with a combination of [3-(13)C]lactate, H(13)CO(3)(-), and [6,6-(2)H(2)]glucose tracers. During rest and exercise, lactate R(a) and R(d) were increased at 55 %-LC compared to 55 %. Glucose R(a) and R(d) were decreased during 55 %-LC compared to 55 %. Lactate R(ox) was increased by LC during exercise (55 %: 6.52 +/- 0.65 and 55 %-LC: 10.01 +/- 0.68 mg kg(-1) min(-1)) which was concurrent with a decrease in glucose oxidation (55 %: 7.64 +/- 0.4 and 55 %-LC: 4.35 +/- 0.31 mg kg(-1) min(-1)). With LC, incorporation of (13)C from tracer lactate into blood glucose (L GNG) increased while both GP and calculated hepatic glycogenolysis (GLY) decreased. Therefore, increased blood [lactate] during moderate intensity exercise increased lactate oxidation, spared blood glucose and decreased glucose production. Further, exogenous lactate infusion did not affect rating of perceived exertion (RPE) during exercise. These results demonstrate that lactate is a useful carbohydrate in times of increased energy demand.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 232 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 13%
Researcher 32 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 13%
Student > Bachelor 27 11%
Student > Postgraduate 18 7%
Other 46 19%
Unknown 55 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 63 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 47 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 60 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2026.
All research outputs
#2,409,011
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physiology
#954
of 12,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,143
of 75,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physiology
#2
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.