↓ Skip to main content

LAGOS-NE: A multi-scaled geospatial and temporal database of lake ecological context and water quality for thousands of U.S. lakes

Overview of attention for article published in Giga Science, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 1,168)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
102 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
LAGOS-NE: A multi-scaled geospatial and temporal database of lake ecological context and water quality for thousands of U.S. lakes
Published in
Giga Science, October 2017
DOI 10.1093/gigascience/gix101
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia A Soranno, Linda C Bacon, Michael Beauchene, Karen E Bednar, Edward G Bissell, Claire K Boudreau, Marvin G Boyer, Mary T Bremigan, Stephen R Carpenter, Jamie W Carr, Kendra S Cheruvelil, Samuel T Christel, Matt Claucherty, Sarah M Collins, Joseph D Conroy, John A Downing, Jed Dukett, C Emi Fergus, Christopher T Filstrup, Clara Funk, Maria J Gonzalez, Linda T Green, Corinna Gries, John D Halfman, Stephen K Hamilton, Paul C Hanson, Emily N Henry, Elizabeth M Herron, Celeste Hockings, James R Jackson, Kari Jacobson-Hedin, Lorraine L Janus, William W Jones, John R Jones, Caroline M Keson, Katelyn B S King, Scott A Kishbaugh, Jean-Francois Lapierre, Barbara Lathrop, Jo A Latimore, Yuehlin Lee, Noah R Lottig, Jason A Lynch, Leslie J Matthews, William H McDowell, Karen E B Moore, Brian P Neff, Sarah J Nelson, Samantha K Oliver, Michael L Pace, Donald C Pierson, Autumn C Poisson, Amina I Pollard, David M Post, Paul O Reyes, Donald O Rosenberry, Karen M Roy, Lars G Rudstam, Orlando Sarnelle, Nancy J Schuldt, Caren E Scott, Nicholas K Skaff, Nicole J Smith, Nick R Spinelli, Joseph J Stachelek, Emily H Stanley, John L Stoddard, Scott B Stopyak, Craig A Stow, Jason M Tallant, Pang-Ning Tan, Anthony P Thorpe, Michael J Vanni, Tyler Wagner, Gretchen Watkins, Kathleen C Weathers, Katherine E Webster, Jeffrey D White, Marcy K Wilmes, Shuai Yuan

Abstract

Understanding the factors that affect water quality and the ecological services provided by freshwater ecosystems is an urgent global environmental issue. Predicting how water quality will respond to global changes not only requires water quality data, but also information about the ecological context of individual water bodies across broad spatial extents. Because lake water quality is usually sampled in limited geographic regions, often for limited time periods, assessing the environmental controls of water quality requires compilation of many datasets across broad regions and across time into an integrated database. LAGOS-NE accomplishes this goal for lakes in the northeastern-most 17 U.S. states. LAGOS-NE contains data for 51,101 lakes and reservoirs larger than 4 ha in 17 lake-rich U.S. states. The database includes three data modules for: lake location and physical characteristics for all lakes; ecological context (i.e., the land use, geologic, climatic, and hydrologic setting of lakes) for all lakes; and in situ measurements of lake water quality for a subset of the lakes from the past three decades for approximately 2,600-12,000 lakes depending on the variable. The database contains approximately 150,000 measures of total phosphorus, 200,000 measures of chlorophyll, and 900,000 measures of Secchi depth. The water quality data were compiled from 87 lake water quality datasets from federal, state, tribal, and non-profit agencies, university researchers, and citizen scientists. This database is one of the largest and most comprehensive databases of its type because it includes both in situ measurements and ecological context data. Because ecological context can be used to study a variety of other questions about lakes, streams, and wetlands, this database can also be used as the foundation for other studies of freshwaters at broad spatial and ecological scales.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 102 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 159 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 22%
Student > Master 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 6%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 28 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 49 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 9%
Engineering 8 5%
Computer Science 5 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 51 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 109. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2019.
All research outputs
#386,954
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Giga Science
#27
of 1,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,193
of 336,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Giga Science
#2
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.