↓ Skip to main content

Comment on “Persistent effects of pre-Columbian plant domestication on Amazonian forest composition”

Overview of attention for article published in Science, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
278 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Comment on “Persistent effects of pre-Columbian plant domestication on Amazonian forest composition”
Published in
Science, October 2017
DOI 10.1126/science.aan8347
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Levis et al (Research Articles, 3 March 2017, p. 925) concluded that pre-Columbian tree domestication has shaped present-day Amazonian forest composition. The study, however, downplays five centuries of human influence following European arrival to the Americas. We show that the effects of post-Columbian activities in Amazonia are likely to have played a larger role than pre-Columbian ones in shaping the observed floristic patterns.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 278 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 16%
Student > Master 43 15%
Researcher 31 11%
Student > Bachelor 28 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Other 35 13%
Unknown 77 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 26%
Environmental Science 54 19%
Arts and Humanities 18 6%
Social Sciences 16 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 5%
Other 23 8%
Unknown 83 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2026.
All research outputs
#1,825,485
of 33,133,799 outputs
Outputs from Science
#26,822
of 93,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,838
of 362,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#665
of 1,280 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,133,799 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,280 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.