↓ Skip to main content

Isoflurane, ketamine-xylazine, and urethane markedly alter breathing even at subtherapeutic doses

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurophysiology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Isoflurane, ketamine-xylazine, and urethane markedly alter breathing even at subtherapeutic doses
Published in
Journal of Neurophysiology, July 2017
DOI 10.1152/jn.00350.2017
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Anesthetics are widely used for animal research on respiratory control in vivo, but their effect on breathing and CO2 chemoreception has not been well characterized in mice, a species now often used for these studies. We previously demonstrated that 1% isoflurane markedly reduces the hypercapnic ventilatory response (HCVR) in adult mice in vivo and masks serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) neuron chemosensitivity in vitro Here we investigated effects of 0.5% isoflurane on breathing in adult mice, and also found a large reduction in the HCVR even at this sub-anesthetic concentration. We then tested the effects on breathing of ketamine-xylazine and urethane - anesthetics widely used in research on breathing. We found that these agents altered baseline breathing and blunted the HCVR at doses within the range typically used experimentally. At lower doses ventilation was decreased, but mice appropriately matched their ventilation to metabolic demands due to a parallel decrease in O2 consumption. Neither ketamine nor urethane decreased chemosensitivity of 5-HT neurons. These results indicate that baseline breathing and/or CO2 chemoreception in mice are decreased by anesthetics widely viewed as not affecting respiratory control, and even at sub-therapeutic doses. These effects of anesthetics on breathing may alter the interpretation of studies of respiratory physiology in vivo.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 19 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 15 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 18%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 20 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurophysiology
#6,905
of 8,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,719
of 326,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurophysiology
#118
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,424 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.