↓ Skip to main content

The Effect of Body Mass Index on Outcome in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Early Analysis From the New Zealand Joint Registry

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Arthroplasty, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Effect of Body Mass Index on Outcome in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Early Analysis From the New Zealand Joint Registry
Published in
The Journal of Arthroplasty, June 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2014.05.024
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah E Murgatroyd, Chris M A Frampton, Mark S Wright

Abstract

This study assessed the early outcomes of total hip arthroplasty compared with body mass index (BMI). 5357 hip arthroplasties were evaluated. Oxford Scores, revision for any reason and other factors including American Society of Anaesthesiology scores, length of surgery and cementation of components were analyzed. Both a high and a low BMI predicted for worse Oxford Hip Scores. Obese and morbidly obese patients had significantly lower six month Oxford Scores than healthy patients, the lowest survival, were younger than all other groups and had greater proportions with fully un-cemented prostheses. At this early stage, the results show that outcome and early revision are statistically and clinically poorer for obese patients.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 16%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Other 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 18 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 20 35%