↓ Skip to main content

Does elevated wall tension cause aortic aneurysm rupture? Investigation using a subject-specific heterogeneous model

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomechanics, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Does elevated wall tension cause aortic aneurysm rupture? Investigation using a subject-specific heterogeneous model
Published in
Journal of Biomechanics, October 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.09.041
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To investigate whether peak wall tension in abdominal aortic aneurysm occurs at the site of rupture to test for a causative relationship. Four ruptured and nine unruptured AAA were harvested whole from cadavers, followed by regional measurements of wall thickness, elastic parameters and failure tension. Finite element models were developed with subject-specific load-free AAA morphology and heterogeneous properties interpolated using a geodesic distance weighted approach from the measurements. The wall tension under uniform pressure and tension to failure tension ratio as an index of susceptibility to rupture were computed. As a secondary aim, the peak wall tension using this heterogeneous model approach was compared to the traditional homogeneous model approach in order to evaluate the reliability of the latter. The average peak wall tension in the ruptured group was 43% higher than in the unruptured group without statistical significance even though it was 54% larger in diameter. The site of peak wall tension was in the vicinity of the site of rupture in two ruptured AAA. The peak tension did not breach failure tension at the rupture site in any of the AAA. The traditional population-wide homogeneous model approach overestimated peak wall tension by just 3% compared to the subject-specific heterogeneous model approach. We failed to find adequate evidence of a causative relationship between peak wall tension and AAA rupture. The findings are not conclusive owing to study limitations such as ignoring intraluminal thrombus, sparse distribution of specimens procured and small study population.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 10 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 9 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Chemistry 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 13 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2017.
All research outputs
#23,121,296
of 28,292,426 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomechanics
#5,078
of 5,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,496
of 338,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomechanics
#99
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,292,426 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.