↓ Skip to main content

Formation of advanced glycation endproducts in ground beef under pasteurisation conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Food Chemistry, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Formation of advanced glycation endproducts in ground beef under pasteurisation conditions
Published in
Food Chemistry, September 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.09.129
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs) in food products may pose health risks, and thermal processing of foods accelerates the formation of AGEs. The effects of heat treatments (65-100 °C, 0-60 min) on the formation of AGEs including N(ε)-carboxymethyllysine (CML) and N(ε)-carboxyethyllysine (CEL) in ground beef were investigated. The levels of CML and CEL in ground beef steadily increased with heating time and heating temperature. A strong linear relationship (r(2) = 0.920) between the amounts of CML (2.76-19.96 mg/kg) and CEL (2.32-11.89 mg/kg) in raw and thermally treated beef was found. The formations of both CML and CEL in ground beef during heat treatments basically fitted zero-order reactions (CML: r(2) = 0.851-0.995, rate constant = 0.031-0.224 mg kg(-1) min(-1); CEL: r(2) = 0.907-0.971, rate constant = 0.044-0.118 mg kg(-1) min(-1)) with an activation energy of 61.01 kJ/mol for CML and 29.21 kJ/mol for CEL.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 80 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Master 6 7%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 24 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 16%
Chemistry 13 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 4%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 28 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2014.
All research outputs
#16,008,400
of 27,263,163 outputs
Outputs from Food Chemistry
#1,555
of 2,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,877
of 265,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Chemistry
#40
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,263,163 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.