↓ Skip to main content

Comparing High‐throughput Platforms for Sequencing the V4 Region of SSU‐rDNA in Environmental Microbial Eukaryotic Diversity Surveys

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Comparing High‐throughput Platforms for Sequencing the V4 Region of SSU‐rDNA in Environmental Microbial Eukaryotic Diversity Surveys
Published in
Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, November 2014
DOI 10.1111/jeu.12187
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

High-throughput DNA sequencing platforms are continuing to increase resulting read lengths, which is allowing for a deeper and more accurate depiction of environmental microbial diversity. With the nascent Reagent Kit v3, Illumina MiSeq now has the ability to sequence the eukaryotic hyper-variable V4 region of the SSU-rDNA locus with paired-end reads. Using DNA collected from soils with analyses of strictly- and nearly-identical amplicon, here we ask how the new Illumina MiSeq data compares with what we can obtain with Roche/454 GS FLX in regards to quantity and quality, presence and absence, and abundance perspectives. We show that there is an easy qualitative transition from the Roche/454 to the Illumina MiSeq platforms. The ease of this transition is more nuanced quantitatively for low-abundant amplicons, although estimates of abundances are known to also vary within platforms. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 125 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 23%
Researcher 30 23%
Student > Master 21 16%
Other 8 6%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 17 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 17%
Environmental Science 19 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 26 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2016.
All research outputs
#17,399,694
of 28,513,504 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology
#719
of 1,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,272
of 380,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,513,504 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,097 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.